<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An argument against trans-inclusion in the GLBT movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/</link>
	<description>and other bigotry</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 00:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wellie</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>wellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-715</guid>
		<description>shame on big gay sketch show for that mess.  i too had to force myself to watch it all the way through.  how was that in ANY way humorous?  and the fact that the editors/censors let this through as a viable and acceptable piece of comedy says a novel.
&lt;i&gt; Not really a consequence of trans inclusion, more a sense of that it’s okay to appropriate trans people like this because we’re part of the acronym. Like, “Hey, since it’s GLBT, if we can make faggot jokes, we can make tranny jokes too!” and then wheel out the most offensive stereotypes possible. &lt;/i&gt;

exactly.  i mean, at this point, i don't even understand why they bother to add the 't' into the acronym... it's insulting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shame on big gay sketch show for that mess.  i too had to force myself to watch it all the way through.  how was that in ANY way humorous?  and the fact that the editors/censors let this through as a viable and acceptable piece of comedy says a novel.<br />
<i> Not really a consequence of trans inclusion, more a sense of that it’s okay to appropriate trans people like this because we’re part of the acronym. Like, “Hey, since it’s GLBT, if we can make faggot jokes, we can make tranny jokes too!” and then wheel out the most offensive stereotypes possible. </i></p>
<p>exactly.  i mean, at this point, i don&#8217;t even understand why they bother to add the &#8216;t&#8217; into the acronym&#8230; it&#8217;s insulting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Kiddle</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Kiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>What did they even think was funny in that steaming pile?  Is the word "tranny" intrinsically good for a laugh or something?

As far as trans inclusion in general goes, I've seen LGB"T" websites where, without exaggeration, the only T about them was in the title.  The worst one was divided into one section for gay and bi men and one for lesbians and bi women - I guess at least it told me upfront there wouldn't be anything aimed at trans people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What did they even think was funny in that steaming pile?  Is the word &#8220;tranny&#8221; intrinsically good for a laugh or something?</p>
<p>As far as trans inclusion in general goes, I&#8217;ve seen LGB&#8221;T&#8221; websites where, without exaggeration, the only T about them was in the title.  The worst one was divided into one section for gay and bi men and one for lesbians and bi women - I guess at least it told me upfront there wouldn&#8217;t be anything aimed at trans people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Harney</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-666</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Harney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-666</guid>
		<description>OH MY GOD. Yeah, I heard about RuPaul defending Shirley Q. Liquor. And the white person: "This person of color agrees with me, so his opinion overrides all other people of color!" I hate that. Nezua calls it the &lt;a href="http://www.theunapologeticmexican.org/glosario.html#melanin" rel="nofollow"&gt;appeal to melanin&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH MY GOD. Yeah, I heard about RuPaul defending Shirley Q. Liquor. And the white person: &#8220;This person of color agrees with me, so his opinion overrides all other people of color!&#8221; I hate that. Nezua calls it the <a href="http://www.theunapologeticmexican.org/glosario.html#melanin" rel="nofollow">appeal to melanin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gorgonqueen</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>gorgonqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-665</guid>
		<description>I seem to recall that RuPaul made a fairly strong defense of the Shirley Q Liquor character, and have a somewhat vaguer recollection that at least one (white) trans writer took the position of "well, RuPaul is a transperson of color, so hir position overrules our sense of offense."

I did not find it convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to recall that RuPaul made a fairly strong defense of the Shirley Q Liquor character, and have a somewhat vaguer recollection that at least one (white) trans writer took the position of &#8220;well, RuPaul is a transperson of color, so hir position overrules our sense of offense.&#8221;</p>
<p>I did not find it convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maudite Entendante</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Maudite Entendante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 04:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>Oh, I figured you were probably being sarcastic (at least partly). 

But I've definitely had fantasies of seceding from The Movement, along the lines of, "Well, if G/L folks don't want to include us [trans folk and allies], we'll pack up our toys and go home."  And those fantasies are only strengthened when, as you put it, &lt;i&gt;"I felt like that what little inclusion we have is used to attack us, like in this sketch."&lt;/i&gt;

My rebuke, such as it was, was directed at BGSS, not at you.  Sorry if I wasn't clear on that.  But yeah, it's days like this I just want to hibernate until The Stupid goes away.  :c/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I figured you were probably being sarcastic (at least partly). </p>
<p>But I&#8217;ve definitely had fantasies of seceding from The Movement, along the lines of, &#8220;Well, if G/L folks don&#8217;t want to include us [trans folk and allies], we&#8217;ll pack up our toys and go home.&#8221;  And those fantasies are only strengthened when, as you put it, <i>&#8220;I felt like that what little inclusion we have is used to attack us, like in this sketch.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>My rebuke, such as it was, was directed at BGSS, not at you.  Sorry if I wasn&#8217;t clear on that.  But yeah, it&#8217;s days like this I just want to hibernate until The Stupid goes away.  :c/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Harney</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-653</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Harney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 02:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-653</guid>
		<description>Not really a consequence of trans &lt;em&gt;inclusion&lt;/em&gt;, more a sense of that it's okay to appropriate trans people like this because we're part of the acronym. Like, "Hey, since it's GLBT, if we can make faggot jokes, we can make tranny jokes too!" and then wheel out the most offensive stereotypes possible.

My post title was sarcasm, as I do think trans people need to be fully included in GLBT everything. I felt like that what little inclusion we have is used to attack us, like in this sketch. I do think equal inclusion would mean that this stuff (or Gendercator, or whatever) just doesn't happen.

Your point about the title is well taken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really a consequence of trans <em>inclusion</em>, more a sense of that it&#8217;s okay to appropriate trans people like this because we&#8217;re part of the acronym. Like, &#8220;Hey, since it&#8217;s GLBT, if we can make faggot jokes, we can make tranny jokes too!&#8221; and then wheel out the most offensive stereotypes possible.</p>
<p>My post title was sarcasm, as I do think trans people need to be fully included in GLBT everything. I felt like that what little inclusion we have is used to attack us, like in this sketch. I do think equal inclusion would mean that this stuff (or Gendercator, or whatever) just doesn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>Your point about the title is well taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maudite Entendante</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-652</link>
		<dc:creator>Maudite Entendante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 02:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-652</guid>
		<description>Oh, how many different layers of &lt;i&gt;wrong&lt;/i&gt; is this?  Though I don't think this is exactly a consequence of trans inclusion ... unless minstrel shows are the argument against the inclusion of African-Americans in Reconstruction-era America, and the Hasty Pudding Theatricals are an example of what happens when you include women in the Ivy old boys' network.

(Which is to say, if trans people &lt;i&gt;were&lt;/i&gt; included on an equal footing in the queer movement-slash-Big Gay Sketch Show, someone would probably have stopped this before it happened.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, how many different layers of <i>wrong</i> is this?  Though I don&#8217;t think this is exactly a consequence of trans inclusion &#8230; unless minstrel shows are the argument against the inclusion of African-Americans in Reconstruction-era America, and the Hasty Pudding Theatricals are an example of what happens when you include women in the Ivy old boys&#8217; network.</p>
<p>(Which is to say, if trans people <i>were</i> included on an equal footing in the queer movement-slash-Big Gay Sketch Show, someone would probably have stopped this before it happened.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nix</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-649</link>
		<dc:creator>nix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-649</guid>
		<description>o_______________O

uh.

what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>o_______________O</p>
<p>uh.</p>
<p>what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Harney</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Harney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Right, I totally should have &lt;em&gt;said&lt;/em&gt; that, too. I mean, holy fuck, it's just Shirley Q. Liquor all over again, which is why I linked stuff about him in the first place.

Have I said this pisses me off?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, I totally should have <em>said</em> that, too. I mean, holy fuck, it&#8217;s just Shirley Q. Liquor all over again, which is why I linked stuff about him in the first place.</p>
<p>Have I said this pisses me off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trin</title>
		<link>http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Trin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questioningtransphobia.wordpress.com/2007/12/07/an-argument-against-trans-inclusion-in-the-glbt-movement/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>cis white men in woc trannyface, even. 

I'd ask Ma to smite them but She's probably a step ahead of me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cis white men in woc trannyface, even. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d ask Ma to smite them but She&#8217;s probably a step ahead of me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
