Donna Rose and Jamison Green Leave HRC Business Council
Also, they’re forming a new organization.
November 27, 2007
An Open Letter To:
Daryl Herrschaft, Director, HRC Workplace Project,
Staff of the HRC Workplace Project,
Members of the HRC Business Council,
Joe Solmonese, E.D., Human Rights Campaign (HRC),
Members of the HRC Board of Directors,
Members of the Transgender Community:It has been an honor and a privilege for both of us to serve on the Human Rights Campaign Business Council. Since joining the Business Council in 2002 we have both played active roles in advancing workplace equality, providing education, guidance and leadership, and ensuring that workplaces in America are fair for ALL employees. Our collective work has been at the forefront of the successes that HRC has enjoyed in recent years, has affected the daily lives of GLBT employees throughout this country in profound and substantive ways, and is a continuing source of pride for us both.
Rather than rest on past achievements, the Business Council continues to develop critical new initiatives to support transgender employees. We are working to raise the bar on the Corporate Equality Index. We are planning to revise and re-publish the booklet Transgender In the Workplace: A Tool For Managers. We are planning a Female-to-Male educational DVD. We have been working on insurance issues affecting transgender employees. Never before have so many important efforts for transgender workers been underway and we are both heavily involved in all of them. That is why the decision we are announcing today is an extremely difficult one.
Recent HRC policy decisions – to actively support a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) that excludes our transgender brothers and sisters as well as gender-variant lesbian, gay, and bisexual people – have placed us in an untenable position. On November 8, the day after the ENDA vote in the House of Representatives, we requested an opportunity to meet personally with HRC President Joe Solmonese to share our concerns and to discuss HRC’s strategy for addressing recent legislative shortcomings before making a decision to stay or go. As the only transgender representatives on the Business Council our community expects us to have some influence, or at least to receive the courtesy of a consultation. Almost 3 weeks have passed since that request and we have heard nothing in response. This lack of response speaks volumes, so we feel compelled to take this stand today.
We are announcing our resignations from the HRC Business Council, effective immediately. Considering recent broken promises, the lack of credibility that HRC has with the transgender community at large, and HRC’s apparent lack of commitment to healing the breach it has caused, we find it impossible to maintain an effective working relationship with the organization.
We have truly enjoyed working with the amazing group of corporate leaders who comprise the Business Council. We thank Daryl Herrschaft, Eric Bloem, Samir Luther, and the rest of the Workplace Project team for their steadfast support, their passion for full equality and inclusion, and their friendship. We are extremely disappointed that HRC legislative decisions have contradicted Business Council efforts to enact only fully-inclusive policies and that we must leave the important work we have been planning unfinished. But principles are not for compromise, so today we do what we feel we must.
The need for education on transgender issues in this country has never been greater or more apparent. In addition, a significant learning from recent events is that, while alliances are necessary, valuable, and often crucial, the transgender community cannot rely excessively on others for success and must assert greater control over its own destiny. Our resignation from the Business Council in no way diminishes our commitment either to the transgender community or to ensuring that workplaces have access to professional training, support and guidance on transgender issues. Rather, it provides new challenges and opportunities.
Since we cannot in good conscience continue these critical efforts in the name of HRC through its Business Council, we will be forming an organization whose sole purpose is to provide ongoing education on transgender issues for businesses, governmental agencies, NGOs, and educational institutions. Our Transgender Education Partnership – TransEducate.com – will be a platform from which we can engage community leaders, develop tools and publications, and establish partnerships with like-minded organizations to work for ALL gender-variant people everywhere.
Although it saddens us to say good-bye to our colleagues on the Business Council we are energized by our vision of the future. We look forward to being a pre-eminent voice in the ongoing effort to provide education about the transgender community. We look forward to the day when the LGBT community can address its issues with a unified voice, and without diminishing any of its constituents. And, we look forward to a day when gender-variance is appreciated as ordinary and non-threatening, and education on these topics will no longer be necessary.
In Solidarity for Equality,
Jamison Green and Donna Rose

Just curious but didn’t the HRC sort of self destruct LAST year for the same reason? What is wrong the the HRC?
elizabeth
November 29, 2007 at 2:50 pm
The HRC has a long-standing institutional bias against trans people. They’re willing to take our money and accept our work, but they will fight tooth and nail to make sure we don’t get included in any civil rights legislation.
They have been known to sabotage other trans activist groups’ efforts.
Lisa Harney
November 29, 2007 at 4:12 pm
heh, i just posted this too. *sigh*
nix
November 29, 2007 at 4:39 pm
Yeah. I hope they have a chance to accomplish something with their new organization, which I cleverly linked in the letter.
Of course, Monica Roberts has been saying that there’s this HRC/politico thing to freeze trans rights out of Washington until 2013 to punish us for being uppity enough to say “Hey, we need those rights too!”
Lisa Harney
November 29, 2007 at 4:59 pm
In some ways I think this is a double-edge sword leaning on the good side.
I think they are right, that we cannot, and should not rely on the rest of the GLBTQ community to support us and our rights.
For one thing, I have heard the comments of some prominent Lesbians in our local community where I live, that as the gay/lesbian/bi community has gotten main-stream acceptance, the leadership of those organizations, and those leaders who were very active in the 60’s through 90’s have gotten lax and less motivated as they have been more and more accepted.
However Trans have not.
Not nearly as much anyway, and we still have our work cut out for us.
I don’t think we can rely on the big LGB organizations to do the heavy lifting for us anymore.
We need to do it ourselves.
This is a good thing in my opinion, as I believe it will cause or community to organize itself in ways that have not happened before, and create more “for trans, by trans” organizations and services which will no doubt be better and more accurate as they will be offered for and by the Trans. community.
We should not alienate the LGB groups, but we should be able to stand on our own feet. and take a stance if necessary.
Personaly I’m for the Idea of 3′rd Gender. A way to organize our stance outside of the traditional Dualism.
The biggest question I have is why the Barney/Franks chose to divide the community over a bill that is guaranteed not to pass. I will certainly be vetoed even if it passes the senate. Why put your foot down over a bill that is going nowhere?
Why not wait a year, and a new president?
-Sarah
Sarah Murray
December 2, 2007 at 1:27 pm
What is 3′rd gender?
Anyway, the thing is that we were part of the gay rights movement from the beginning, and we have done a lot of heavy lifting for the GLBT organizations that exist now.
Also, I don’t believe that trans people have remained at the same level of acceptance over the past 40 years. I believe that while there have been ups and downs, acceptance has been steadily on the rise. The idea that acceptance for trans people has always been and remains low is part of the propaganda that Barney Frank and HRC were using to justify the exclusion, but it’s just not true.
Lisa Harney
December 2, 2007 at 2:14 pm
[...] the HRC, to go forward with the non-inclusive ENDA. Prominent trans activists working with the HRC felt compelled to resign. The HRC put out a jaw-droppingly tone-deaf PR plan to win back the hearts of the trans community. [...]
Feministe » Telling it like it is
January 4, 2008 at 12:51 am